How to Understand The Gospel As A Cause For Rejoicing

The Gospel Is A Cause For Rejoicing

© 2026 by C. O. Bishop

2nd Corinthians 1:12-24 (Read it!)

Introduction:

We have examined a couple of passages in 2nd Corinthians 1, and ended with verse eleven. Now we want to progress through Paul’s explanation of his own motives in life and in teaching.

The Gospel Is A Cause For Rejoicing, Both To The Speaker And The Hearers.

12 For our rejoicing is this, the testimony of our conscience, that in simplicity and godly sincerity, not with fleshly wisdom, but by the grace of God, we have had our conversation (Greek, “anastrepho”…how we live our lives) in the world, and more abundantly to you-ward.

Paul and his associates rejoiced in having a clean conscience, knowing that their testimony was consistent. He gave full credit to the Lord, as the One who made such lives possible. He and his team had “practiced what they preached.” They had not given a mixed message. They never preached one thing, as if it mattered, and then did the opposite, as if it did not matter. They preached the truth, and lived it, too! And they rejoiced for the privilege to have served!

13 For we write none other things unto you, than what ye read or acknowledge; and I trust ye shall acknowledge even to the end; 14 As also ye have acknowledged us in part, that we are your rejoicing, even as ye also are our’s in the day of the Lord Jesus.

I found this passage to be difficult to understand in the King James Version. The translators used the word “acknowledge” when the intent was “to understand.”

The New International Version Renders It This Way:

For we do not write you anything you cannot read or understand. And I hope that, 14 as you have understood us in part, you will come to understand fully that you can boast of us just as we will boast of you in the day of the Lord Jesus.

Our “objective” in all speech or writing is communication. But without understanding, we have not communicated. I believe that “Until learning occurs, I have not accomplished teaching.” Paul seemed to agree with this principle. He and his fellow laborers were careful, in writing. They used language they knew the recipients could read. They taught concepts they knew they could understand.

Their hope was that the understanding would continue to develop until the Corinthian believers completely understood the message of Christ. The end result of such understanding is Joy! Paul and his fellow-laborers already rejoiced to see the reality of Christ developing in the lives of the Corinthian believers. (Despite their many errors.)

They hoped the Corinthian believers, eventually, would fully rejoice to have received the message from Paul. (It was not always “fun to hear” Paul’s message. Most of the Corinthian letters are corrective teaching. In our natural selves, we don’t like to be corrected.)

What About Correction, When It Matters?

When we desperately need to be correct in some matter, and we know that the person correcting us truly does know what is correct, and that they are truly acting for our benefit, then correction is precious to us. But when we just want to think that whatever we are doing is correct, then we resent correction. It makes us unapproachable when we feel and act this way.

Personal Example:

A missionary friend told of a tense situation: He and his family had invited several couples from the remote people they were serving, to have dinner at their house. But as the meal progressed, he could see that the men looked more and more angry, and the women looked both embarrassed and flattered.

He had no idea what was happening. His daughter rescued him. She asked him to help with something in the kitchen: There, she asked, “Daddy, do you know what you are doing??” He  knew something was wrong, but did not know why. So he replied honestly, “NO! Please tell me!”

She explained that he had been trying to dislodge a piece of corn from between his molars, by probing with his tongue. “But, Daddy, in this culture, THIS…” (poking her tongue into her cheek) “means THIS! (She gave a sly, suggestive wink!)

The missionary was horrified to learn that he had been openly (though unknowingly) flirting with all the wives of the men they had invited as guests. He marched right back into the dining room, and confessed his abysmal ignorance of their culture. He explained that he had only been trying to get a piece of corn out of his teeth.

They accepted his apology, and cheered up, saying “We do it this way!” (Shoving a finger into the far reaches of their mouths, and picking with a fingernail.) The ministry in that village was saved by a young girl who was more observant of culture than the adults were, and a father who was not too proud to learn from a child.

Paul’s Original Intent

15 And in this confidence I was minded to come unto you before, that ye might have a second benefit; 16 And to pass by you into Macedonia, and to come again out of Macedonia unto you, and of you to be brought on my way toward Judaea.

Paul had intended to pass their way again, but it had not yet worked out. His intention had been to bring additional blessing through teaching, and guidance, as the Holy Spirit worked in their midst, by his presence and teaching and example.

17 When I therefore was thus minded, did I use lightness? or the things that I purpose, do I purpose according to the flesh, that with me there should be yea yea, and nay nay? 18 But as God is true, our word toward you was not yea and nay. 19 For the Son of God, Jesus Christ, who was preached among you by us, even by me and Silvanus and Timotheus, was not yea and nay, but in him was yea.

No Double Meanings: No Ambiguity

Jesus was not ambiguous in His teaching. Paul sought to also be ambiguous. He did not “say one thing and mean another.”  (As an example, he asked, “Do you think I was ‘just talking’ when I said I wanted to visit you?”)

He did not speak lightly to them about anything. Life is serious, even when individual things are amusing or entertaining. The overall results of life are very serious. He had wanted to visit them, and still wanted to do so.

Paul did not “pretend to agree with them and then attempt to correct them.” He was not playing games, and he was never “two-faced” about his ministry. As a God-ordained Apostle, Paul told the truth all the time, and did not try to “soft-peddle…soft-sell” anything. He told the blunt truth.

20 For all the promises of God in him are yea, and in him Amen, unto the glory of God by us.

Paul assured them that all the promises of God were secure. There was no “hidden agenda” with them or with God. As they offered God’s Word, they did so in complete transparency.

Who Builds The Relationships Between Teachers And Their Hearers?

21 Now he which stablisheth us with you in Christ, and hath anointed us, is God; 22 Who hath also sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts.

Remember that the One who assures us that the teaching we are hearing, and the person doing the teaching are from Jesus Christ, and not leading us astray, is God Himself. God sends the faithful shepherds, and He has sealed them in Christ (Same as He did with us!) and has indwelt them with the person of the Holy Spirit. (Again, the same as He did for us!)

And God has given us the means, in His Word, by which to ascertain their character and their trustworthiness: God tells the necessary qualifications for all the (Elders, Shepherds, Overseers,) and Deacons, in 1st Timothy 3:1-8, in Titus 1:5-9, and in 1st Peter 5:1-4.

He tells us what their task is, in both the Old and the New Testament. (In Ezekiel 34:1-10, God laid out seven tasks of the shepherds of Israel, and He condemned them for not even trying to do those things.

And, in Ephesians 4:11-16, God tells us the additional tasks of the New Testament Church leaders. In Acts 20:26-35, he gave final commands to the Elders of the Church at Ephesus. So, we all have the capacity and resources to look, and to search the scriptures, to see whether the teaching is from God, and whether the workers are doing what they are called to do.

Why Did Paul Not Visit Corinth Again, Sooner?

23 Moreover I call God for a record upon my soul, that to spare you I came not as yet unto Corinth.

Paul knew that the Church at Corinth was riddled with problems, but he did not want to come to them with a list of “all the things they were doing wrong.” He hoped to come to them only to confer a blessing, through fellowship and additional teaching: Not to “Straighten you numbskulls out!” He did not want that sort of relationship with them. Paul had led most of them to Christ, and evidently had baptized a few of them. He would rather enjoy a fatherly, loving relationship with them, rather than constantly scolding and correcting them.

Additionally, he freely confessed that their faith was not to be ruled by Paul, but by Jesus. He only hoped to add to their joy by helping them in their faith. He concluded that it was by faith alone that they stood righteous before God.

24 Not for that we have dominion over your faith, but are helpers of your joy: for by faith ye stand.

What About Here At True Hope?

We do not “dominate the faith” of anyone here. Our primary goal is to feed the Flock: To help the flock to gain a deeper understanding of God’s Word. All of us seek to help one another to experience faith, and God’s Peace, and the Joy of the Lord. We seek to build disciples who can, in turn, build others, drawing others to believe the Gospel of Christ, and to understand His Word.

The Great Commission comprises the “marching orders” for the whole Body of Christ. We want to teach one another to embrace the One Job he has given to us. We have a multitude of “tasks,” and not all of us have the same tasks, because, for one thing, our gifts also vary.

But ALL of us have only One Job: the Great Commission was given several times, and in different contexts, and in slightly different phrasing: but the central command is the same. We are His Witnesses: We are Ambassadors for Christ. That is not a matter of choice, or preference. That is our reason to exist!

Lord Jesus, awaken in our hearts the earnest desire to walk with You and to become active ambassadors of the King of Kings: representatives of the Savior, the eternal God in the Flesh. Take away our constant tendency to wander away to toys and earthly distractions. Teach us the serious central issues of life.

How Does The Burden of the Gospel Affect Us?

The Burden of the Gospel

© 2024 C. O. Bishop

1st Corinthians 9:1-19

1 Am I am not an apostle? am I not free? have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord? are not ye my work in the Lord? If I be not an apostle unto others, yet doubtless I am to you: for the seal of mine apostleship are ye in the Lord.

Mine answer to them that do examine me is this,

Have we not power to eat and to drink? Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other apostles, and as the brethren of the Lord, and Cephas? Or I only and Barnabas, have not we power to forbear working?

Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? For it is written in the law of Moses, thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen?

Application of Old Testament Truth in New Testament Practice

10 Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. 11 If we have sown unto you spiritual things, is it a great thing if we shall reap your carnal things?

12 If others be partakers of this power over you, are not we rather? Nevertheless we have not used this power; but suffer all things, lest we should hinder the gospel of Christ.

13 Do ye not know that they which minister about holy things live of the things of the temple? and they which wait at the altar are partakers with the altar? 14 Even so hath the Lord ordained that they which preach the gospel should live of the gospel.

15 But I have used none of these things: neither have I written these things, that it should be so done unto me: for it were better for me to die, than that any man should make my glorying void. 16 For though I preach the gospel, I have nothing to glory of: for necessity is laid upon me; yea, woe is unto me, if I preach not the gospel!

17 For if I do this thing willingly, I have a reward: but if against my will, a dispensation of the gospel is committed unto me. 18 What is my reward then? Verily that, when I preach the gospel, I may make the gospel of Christ without charge, that I abuse not my power in the gospel.

19 For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more.

Introduction:

Wherever the Gospel went, there were various responses. The most common response was (and still is) rejection. But, among those who seem to receive the Gospel, there is a wide range of “receptions.”

Some claim to believe the message, and they verbally agree with every point of the message. But when it gets “close to home,” so to speak, then they begin to argue. If the message requires a change in their beliefs or their behavior, they balk. They say, “Well, I don’t see it that way! I don’t think that is what it really means!”

The false believers attack the messengers as the arguments become more intense. They question the credentials of the messenger. If that doesn’t work, they attack his or her looks, mannerisms, grammar, or some other (equally irrelevant) thing. If the message is true, it does not (should not) matter who brings the message. It doesn’t matter whether you “like” that messenger.

God did not tell us what the accusations against Paul were. We can deduce from his defense what the various attacks might have been.

Appearance Is Not A Good Criterion for Judgment

Appearance is not an accurate predictor of the content of books, nor the expertise of teachers. The adage, “Never judge a book by its cover” is especially true in teachers. Our society has taught us to think that, “If a person looks good, they must be good. If they look trustworthy, they must be trustworthy.”

This is not peculiar to our society: God prophesied against the Jews, that they would do the same. Isaiah 3:6, 7 …. a man shall take hold of his brother of the house of his father, saying, Thou hast clothing, be thou our ruler, and let this ruin be under thy hand:

In that day shall he swear, saying, I will not be an healer; for in my house is neither bread nor clothing: make me not a ruler of the people.”

In that prophecy, one person attempts to nominate another for public office, because he looks good, and has appropriate clothing. But. the response is shallow, too. The man says that his outward appearance is deceptive: that he is truly destitute, so he declines to rule.

But when has physical wealth ever been a good predictor of leadership quality? Both outlooks are wrong! Remember Nabal: He was very wealthy, but he was an utter, self-centered fool.

Grammar and Accent are Also Undependable

Rudy Johnson was a humble and a truly Godly man. He was one of my best teachers. But, he had an odd speech impediment that made it very difficult for him to pronounce words correctly. He did not allow it to stop him, though it engendered a good deal of humor amongst those who heard him. Some people meant it as good-natured humor, but some were derisive.

Some simply enjoyed what seemed to be just a dialectic peculiarity, because he also had a deep southern accent. But others rejected him because “he can’t even talk right!”

I enjoyed him immensely, but I did not find out until years later that his garbled speech was due to some medical anomaly. He and his wife both assured me that he wanted to pronounce words correctly, but he was unable to do so. It was frustrating to him, but he served faithfully anyway.

Orthodoxy is Not Necessarily a Guarantee of Godliness

The word “orthodox” simply means “having correct opinions,” or “teaching correctly.” But a person may recite a creed correctly without believing it. They “parrot the words.” They learned the words. But they have not applied the meaning of those words to their own lives.

I have known blatantly ungodly individuals who could correctly quote scriptures and teachers who could correctly teach through a given passage of scripture, though they, themselves, were not believers, and did not believe the Bible was the Word of God. It was “literature” to them.

They had “correct opinions” about what the Bible said, but no personal commitment to those truths. So, at best, a person who chose to pursue the “job” of preaching, because he saw it as a “reasonably well-paid job, with minimal real work,” is a hireling. He may superficially believe that the Bible is “true,” but he does not allow it to direct his life. He may have learned “correct information” only because he saw it as a means by which to “get the job.” But, at worst, he may be a charlatan, hoping to “fleece the flock of God.” Money may be his only motive.

Remember, the Priests and the Pharisees were “orthodox” as a rule, but they hated Jesus, and they had zero care for His flock. They only wanted the prosperity and honor that came along with their social status.

So, Why Did People Reject Paul?

Appearance, Perhaps?

Paul had gone through some pretty savage treatment at the hands of unbelieving Jews, in the weeks or months just before he first arrived in Corinth. (Acts 14, 16 and 17)

Stoned

The people at Lystra (Acts 14:19) stoned Paul. They thought they had killed him. But he eventually got up and walked back into the city, and he left the next day. He suffered some serious injuries in that attack, for sure: possibly permanent disfiguring marks and scars.

Beaten

The magistrates at Philippi savagely beat Paul and Silas in Acts 16:22, 23. He and Silas were probably still bleeding from that beating when they came to Thessalonica. (His arrival there was only a few days after the Philippian Jailer had dressed his wounds and those of Silas.)

At Thessalonica, there was a riot and a revival, in response to the Gospel. Many had believed the Gospel, but the unbelieving Jews stirred up a mob of Gentiles and made an attack on the house where Paul had been staying. Paul wasn’t there at the moment, though; and the believers sent him away for his safety and theirs. He had only been in Thessalonica for about three weeks.

Paul then went to Athens, but only stayed a short while. He preached there, but he had very little fruit, so he left and went to Corinth. And, there, he preached only Jesus Christ and Him Crucified.

As a result of all of the above, he arrived in Corinth looking “pretty rough.” We don’t know just how badly he was wounded in the stoning at Lystra, but we suspect there were severe head wounds, and later, it is revealed that his eyes were affected. We can’t prove it was because of the stoning at Lystra, but it seems likely. So… the people who eventually argued against Paul had his appearance to use for “ammunition,” if they chose to do so.

In reality, those scars should have been seen as emblems of integrity: Paul had endured the stoning and the beatings, and he continued to teach, wherever he went. (People don’t usually do that for a message they know to be a lie.) See his comment about those scars in Galatians 6:17.

Language, Mannerisms, and Motives?

Paul was a Jew from Tarsus, so whatever stigma that added could be used as well. His detractors were local, whether Jews or Gentiles, so they may have seemed more attractive to their audience simply because they spoke in the same way as their hearers. (They sounded less “foreign.”)

Further, Paul says he came to them determined to “…know nothing except Christ and Him Crucified.” (1st Corinthians 2:1, 2) His detractors had no such limitation, and some of them (we see later) were professional orators. Paul was simply giving the truth of the Gospel.

Unorthodox Teaching

Unlike the Judaizers, Paul was preaching the Gospel of Christ, which eliminated the “partition” between Jews and Gentiles. So, to both the Jews and the Gentiles, Paul seemed to be teaching “strange doctrines.” Had they listened closely (and some did) they would have learned that this “new doctrine” was the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies. In other words, it was not “unorthodox,” in the truest sense. It was just “unusual:” They had never heard it before.

Unorthodox Behavior

Also, unlike other “traveling teachers,” Paul was not “taking up a collection.” He was not demanding anything in return for the message he proclaimed.

There is a common notion that something of lesser “price” must therefore be of lesser “worth.” It is a common idea today, too. “There must be a reason it is free, or offered at such a low price!” “You get what you pay for!” “Yes, you got it for free and it has been worth every penny!”

We know the price of something without knowing its value. Notice that the words “priceless” and “valueless” have opposite meanings.

So, the fact that Paul refused to be a burden to his listeners may have been one of the things used as an accusation against him.

Corrective Teaching

Paul pointed out that he DID have the right to expect support from those he taught, but that he chose to forego that right, so as not to burden these new believers.

He pointed out that the other apostles were married, and were supported, but that he had chosen to serve single, and to support his ministry by physical work. (As a tentmaker with Aquila and Priscilla, there in Corinth. Acts 18:1-3) They saw him working, supporting himself and his entourage, and they jumped to the wrong conclusion that he had less credibility and authority than the traveling teachers who perhaps rented an auditorium and then charged admission fees to attend. In verse 18, he said that would have been an abuse of his authority.

Paul confirmed that it was ordained by God in the Old Testament that the teachers and leaders were to be supported by those of the flock.

Pauls Motive in Declining Pay

But, in verses 15-18, he said that he would sooner die than have his testimony destroyed by such a small issue. He went on to say that his assignment was to preach the Gospel of Christ, whether he did so willingly or unwillingly. If he worked willingly, there was a reward coming! But, if he was unwilling, the assignment did not change: You see, he saw the preaching of the Gospel as his only job. And if he failed to do it, he was in trouble with the Lord!

Remember in verse one, he said, “Am I not free?” (meaning, “I am not your slave!”) But he concludes in verse 19 that though he truly was free from bondage to any human, he counted it a privilege and a reward, to offer the Gospel of Christ free of charge. Therefore, he willingly became the servant (slave) of all people so that he might reach more people with the Gospel.

We would do well to emulate that attitude, ourselves.

Lord Jesus, please allow us to emulate Your Humility as described in Philippians chapter two, and empty ourselves of our incessant demand for recognition. Let us lay aside our “rights” and our self-aggrandizement and our self-affirmation, and offer Glory only to You!